# Bitfocus Companion vs mitmproxy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Bitfocus Companion | mitmproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 104 in Home Automation | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 2 344 | 46 462 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 | +1 318 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v5.1.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 67/100 for Bitfocus Companion, so it is the safer default.

Bitfocus Companion ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 318 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Bitfocus Companion](https://selfhost.directory/project/bitfocus-companion) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bitfocus-companion.md)
- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bitfocus-companion-vs-mitmproxy