# Bitfocus Companion vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Bitfocus Companion | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 104 in Home Automation | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 2 345 | 132 663 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 | +3 306 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 1458 ✓ |
| Latest release | v5.1.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | b11969 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 68/100 for Bitfocus Companion, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1458 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for Bitfocus Companion.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 306 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Bitfocus Companion](https://selfhost.directory/project/bitfocus-companion) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bitfocus-companion.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bitfocus-companion-vs-llamacpp