# Bitfocus Companion vs LAN-Orangutan

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Bitfocus Companion | LAN-Orangutan |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 ✓ | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 104 in Home Automation | #15 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 2 345 ✓ | 1 139 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v5.1.1 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.4.2 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Bitfocus Companion scores 68/100 against 58/100 for LAN-Orangutan, so it is the safer default.

Bitfocus Companion ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for LAN-Orangutan.

If you want the quickest setup, LAN-Orangutan is easier to run; Bitfocus Companion needs more configuration.

Bitfocus Companion is growing faster right now (+46 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Bitfocus Companion](https://selfhost.directory/project/bitfocus-companion) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bitfocus-companion.md)
- [LAN-Orangutan](https://selfhost.directory/project/lan-orangutan) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lan-orangutan.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bitfocus-companion-vs-lan-orangutan