Bitfocus CompanionvsHomarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Bitfocus Companion | Homarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 104 in Home Automation | #4 of 44 in Dashboard |
| GitHub stars | 2 345 | 5 230 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 | +454 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 43 |
| Latest release | v5.1.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | v2.9.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Homarr scores 74/100 against 68/100 for Bitfocus Companion, so it is the safer default.
Homarr ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for Bitfocus Companion.
If you want the quickest setup, Homarr is easier to run; Bitfocus Companion needs more configuration.
Homarr is growing faster right now (+454 stars in 30 days).
Bitfocus Companion details →Homarr details →
Swap a project
Keep Bitfocus Companion, compare it with
Keep Homarr, compare it with