Bitfocus Companionvsglobalping-probe
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Bitfocus Companion | globalping-probe | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 104 in Home Automation | #29 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 2 344 | 215 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 19 |
| Latest release | v5.1.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.54.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | ISC |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Bitfocus Companion scores 68/100 against 48/100 for globalping-probe, so it is the safer default.
Bitfocus Companion ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for globalping-probe.
If you want the quickest setup, globalping-probe is easier to run; Bitfocus Companion needs more configuration.
Bitfocus Companion is growing faster right now (+45 stars in 30 days).
Bitfocus Companion details →globalping-probe details →
Swap a project
Keep Bitfocus Companion, compare it with
Keep globalping-probe, compare it with