# bitcoind vs SRS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bitcoind | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Fintech | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 90 532 ✓ | 29 391 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +289 ✓ | +112 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | v29.5 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | C |

## Which one should you pick?

bitcoind scores 87/100 against 78/100 for SRS, so it is the safer default.

SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for bitcoind.

If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; bitcoind needs more configuration.

bitcoind is growing faster right now (+289 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bitcoind](https://selfhost.directory/project/bitcoind) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bitcoind.md)
- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bitcoind-vs-srs