# bitcoind vs metamcp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bitcoind | metamcp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Fintech | #10 of 39 in API Gateway |
| GitHub stars | 90 527 ✓ | 2 734 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +287 ✓ | +48 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v29.5 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.4.22 · 19 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

bitcoind scores 87/100 against 61/100 for metamcp, so it is the safer default.

bitcoind ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for metamcp.

If you want the quickest setup, metamcp is easier to run; bitcoind needs more configuration.

bitcoind is growing faster right now (+287 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bitcoind](https://selfhost.directory/project/bitcoind) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bitcoind.md)
- [metamcp](https://selfhost.directory/project/metamcp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metamcp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bitcoind-vs-metamcp