# birdnet-go vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | birdnet-go | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Audio Streaming | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 2 377 | 35 795 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +193 | +834 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | 20261014 · 14 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 69/100 for birdnet-go, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for birdnet-go.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+834 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [birdnet-go](https://selfhost.directory/project/birdnet-go) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/birdnet-go.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/birdnet-go-vs-seaweedfs