# bindery vs 心潮动态心智系统

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bindery | 心潮动态心智系统 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #146 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 541 ✓ | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.46.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.6.0 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

bindery scores 56/100 against 44/100 for 心潮动态心智系统, so it is the safer default.

bindery ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for 心潮动态心智系统.

## Details

- [bindery](https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery.md)
- [心潮动态心智系统](https://selfhost.directory/project/xinchao-dynamic-mind) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/xinchao-dynamic-mind.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bindery-vs-xinchao-dynamic-mind