# bindery vs wraft

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bindery | wraft |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 541 ✓ | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.46.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

bindery scores 56/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.

bindery ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.

If you want the quickest setup, bindery is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.

bindery is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bindery](https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery.md)
- [wraft](https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bindery-vs-wraft