# bindery vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bindery | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 540 | 2 260 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.46.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 56/100 for bindery, so it is the safer default.

bindery ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, bindery is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

## Details

- [bindery](https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bindery-vs-windows-arm