# bindery vs Warpgate

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bindery | Warpgate |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 540 | 8 159 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +199 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 33 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.46.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Warpgate scores 75/100 against 56/100 for bindery, so it is the safer default.

Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 26 for bindery.

If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; bindery needs more configuration.

Warpgate is growing faster right now (+199 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bindery](https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery.md)
- [Warpgate](https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bindery-vs-warpgate