# bindery vs voidaccess

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bindery | voidaccess |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 57/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 540 | 949 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 ✓ | 18 |
| Latest release | v1.46.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

voidaccess scores 57/100 against 56/100 for bindery, so it is the safer default.

bindery ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for voidaccess.

If you want the quickest setup, bindery is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.

## Details

- [bindery](https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery.md)
- [voidaccess](https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bindery-vs-voidaccess