# bindery vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bindery | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 59/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 540 | 1 718 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.46.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Go | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

UUSEC WAF scores 59/100 against 56/100 for bindery, so it is the safer default.

bindery ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

UUSEC WAF is growing faster right now (+6 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bindery](https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bindery-vs-uusec-waf