binderyvsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bindery | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 540 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.46.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Go | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
UUSEC WAF scores 59/100 against 56/100 for bindery, so it is the safer default.
bindery ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
UUSEC WAF is growing faster right now (+6 stars in 30 days).
bindery details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep bindery, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with