# bindery vs Uptime-Kuma-Web-API

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bindery | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 544 ✓ | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.46.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

bindery scores 57/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

bindery ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.

bindery is growing faster right now (+4 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bindery](https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery.md)
- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bindery-vs-uptime-kuma-web-api