# bindery vs Umami

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bindery | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 541 | 39 759 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +763 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | v1.46.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Umami scores 85/100 against 56/100 for bindery, so it is the safer default.

bindery ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Umami.

If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; bindery needs more configuration.

Umami is growing faster right now (+763 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bindery](https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery.md)
- [Umami](https://selfhost.directory/project/umami) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umami.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bindery-vs-umami