# bindery vs Typecho

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bindery | Typecho |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #1 of 24 in Blogging |
| GitHub stars | 540 | 12 456 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +9 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.46.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | ci · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Typecho scores 66/100 against 56/100 for bindery, so it is the safer default.

bindery ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Typecho.

If you want the quickest setup, Typecho is easier to run; bindery needs more configuration.

Typecho is growing faster right now (+9 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bindery](https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery.md)
- [Typecho](https://selfhost.directory/project/typecho) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typecho.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bindery-vs-typecho