# bindery vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bindery | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 540 | 15 908 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.46.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

transfer.sh scores 69/100 against 56/100 for bindery, so it is the safer default.

bindery ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; bindery needs more configuration.

transfer.sh is growing faster right now (+11 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bindery](https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bindery-vs-transfersh