# bindery vs Teleport

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bindery | Teleport |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #4 of 40 in Authentication |
| GitHub stars | 540 | 21 040 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +104 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.46.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v18.10.0 · 8 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Teleport scores 76/100 against 56/100 for bindery, so it is the safer default.

bindery ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Teleport.

If you want the quickest setup, bindery is easier to run; Teleport needs more configuration.

Teleport is growing faster right now (+104 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bindery](https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery.md)
- [Teleport](https://selfhost.directory/project/teleport) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/teleport.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bindery-vs-teleport