binderyvsTdarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bindery | Tdarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #2 of 18 in Video Processing |
| GitHub stars | 541 | 4 369 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +37 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.46.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Makefile |
Which one should you pick?
Tdarr scores 66/100 against 56/100 for bindery, so it is the safer default.
bindery ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tdarr.
If you want the quickest setup, Tdarr is easier to run; bindery needs more configuration.
Tdarr is growing faster right now (+37 stars in 30 days).
bindery details →Tdarr details →
Swap a project
Keep bindery, compare it with
Keep Tdarr, compare it with