# bindery vs Standard Notes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bindery | Standard Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 70/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 541 | 6 685 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +52 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.46.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | @standardnotes/mobile@3.202.11 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Standard Notes scores 70/100 against 56/100 for bindery, so it is the safer default.

bindery ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Standard Notes.

If you want the quickest setup, bindery is easier to run; Standard Notes needs more configuration.

Standard Notes is growing faster right now (+52 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bindery](https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery.md)
- [Standard Notes](https://selfhost.directory/project/standard-notes) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/standard-notes.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bindery-vs-standard-notes