# bindery vs Scada-LTS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bindery | Scada-LTS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 543 | 1 019 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.46.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

bindery and Scada-LTS score the same (56/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

bindery ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.

bindery is growing faster right now (+3 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bindery](https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery.md)
- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bindery-vs-scada-lts