binderyvsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bindery | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 541 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.46.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
bindery scores 56/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
bindery ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
bindery is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).
bindery details →Scada-LTS details →
Swap a project
Keep bindery, compare it with
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with