# bindery vs rudderstack

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bindery | rudderstack |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform |
| GitHub stars | 541 | 4 508 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +20 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 39 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.46.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

rudderstack scores 64/100 against 56/100 for bindery, so it is the safer default.

rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 27 for bindery.

If you want the quickest setup, bindery is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.

rudderstack is growing faster right now (+20 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bindery](https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery.md)
- [rudderstack](https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bindery-vs-rudderstack