# bindery vs polar

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bindery | polar |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #1 of 13 in Billing |
| GitHub stars | 544 | 10 437 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +158 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.46.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | @polar-sh/cli@3.0.0 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

polar scores 71/100 against 57/100 for bindery, so it is the safer default.

bindery ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for polar.

If you want the quickest setup, bindery is easier to run; polar needs more configuration.

polar is growing faster right now (+158 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bindery](https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery.md)
- [polar](https://selfhost.directory/project/polar) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/polar.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bindery-vs-polar