# bindery vs Onlook

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bindery | Onlook |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #1 of 6 in Web Development |
| GitHub stars | 543 | 27 033 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 | +61 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.46.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Onlook scores 69/100 against 56/100 for bindery, so it is the safer default.

bindery ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Onlook.

If you want the quickest setup, bindery is easier to run; Onlook needs more configuration.

Onlook is growing faster right now (+61 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bindery](https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery.md)
- [Onlook](https://selfhost.directory/project/onlook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/onlook.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bindery-vs-onlook