binderyvsOnlook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bindery | Onlook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #1 of 6 in Web Development |
| GitHub stars | 541 | 27 028 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +56 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.46.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Onlook scores 69/100 against 56/100 for bindery, so it is the safer default.
bindery ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Onlook.
If you want the quickest setup, bindery is easier to run; Onlook needs more configuration.
Onlook is growing faster right now (+56 stars in 30 days).
bindery details →Onlook details →
Swap a project
Keep bindery, compare it with
Keep Onlook, compare it with