# bindery vs octelium

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bindery | octelium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 59/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #22 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 543 | 4 134 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 | +64 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 21 |
| Latest release | v1.46.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.47.0 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

octelium scores 59/100 against 57/100 for bindery, so it is the safer default.

bindery ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for octelium.

If you want the quickest setup, bindery is easier to run; octelium needs more configuration.

octelium is growing faster right now (+64 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bindery](https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery.md)
- [octelium](https://selfhost.directory/project/octelium) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octelium.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bindery-vs-octelium