# bindery vs minisatip

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bindery | minisatip |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #33 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 540 ✓ | 373 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 21 |
| Latest release | v1.46.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.0.179 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

bindery scores 56/100 against 52/100 for minisatip, so it is the safer default.

bindery ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for minisatip.

If you want the quickest setup, bindery is easier to run; minisatip needs more configuration.

## Details

- [bindery](https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery.md)
- [minisatip](https://selfhost.directory/project/minisatip) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/minisatip.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bindery-vs-minisatip