# bindery vs MCSManager

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bindery | MCSManager |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 68/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #8 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 540 | 5 004 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +34 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 20 |
| Latest release | v1.46.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v10.22.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

MCSManager scores 68/100 against 56/100 for bindery, so it is the safer default.

bindery ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for MCSManager.

If you want the quickest setup, MCSManager is easier to run; bindery needs more configuration.

MCSManager is growing faster right now (+34 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bindery](https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery.md)
- [MCSManager](https://selfhost.directory/project/mcsmanager) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mcsmanager.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bindery-vs-mcsmanager