binderyvsLubeLogger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bindery | LubeLogger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 543 | 2 926 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 | +69 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 17 |
| Latest release | v1.46.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
LubeLogger scores 65/100 against 57/100 for bindery, so it is the safer default.
bindery ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for LubeLogger.
If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; bindery needs more configuration.
LubeLogger is growing faster right now (+69 stars in 30 days).
bindery details →LubeLogger details →
Swap a project
Keep bindery, compare it with
Keep LubeLogger, compare it with