# bindery vs Infisical

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bindery | Infisical |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management |
| GitHub stars | 543 | 30 123 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 | +707 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 79 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.46.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Infisical scores 78/100 against 56/100 for bindery, so it is the safer default.

Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 27 for bindery.

If you want the quickest setup, bindery is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.

Infisical is growing faster right now (+707 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bindery](https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery.md)
- [Infisical](https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bindery-vs-infisical