binderyvsInfisical
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bindery | Infisical | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management |
| GitHub stars | 541 | 30 118 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +702 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 79 |
| Latest release | v1.46.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Infisical scores 78/100 against 56/100 for bindery, so it is the safer default.
Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 27 for bindery.
If you want the quickest setup, bindery is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.
Infisical is growing faster right now (+702 stars in 30 days).
bindery details →Infisical details →
Swap a project
Keep bindery, compare it with
Keep Infisical, compare it with