binderyvsHiClaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bindery | HiClaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #32 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 540 | 5 886 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +223 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 15 |
| Latest release | v1.46.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
HiClaw scores 67/100 against 56/100 for bindery, so it is the safer default.
bindery ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for HiClaw.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; bindery needs more configuration.
HiClaw is growing faster right now (+223 stars in 30 days).
bindery details →HiClaw details →
Swap a project
Keep bindery, compare it with
Keep HiClaw, compare it with