# bindery vs hass-configurator

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bindery | hass-configurator |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 544 ✓ | 339 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.46.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

bindery scores 57/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.

bindery ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.

bindery is growing faster right now (+4 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bindery](https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery.md)
- [hass-configurator](https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bindery-vs-hass-configurator