# bindery vs Fish Speech

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bindery | Fish Speech |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 540 | 33 452 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +129 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.46.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 56/100 for bindery, so it is the safer default.

bindery ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, bindery is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+129 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bindery](https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery.md)
- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bindery-vs-fish-speech