# bindery vs Conreq

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bindery | Conreq |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #105 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 540 ✓ | 151 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.46.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 0.22.1 · 25 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

bindery scores 56/100 against 44/100 for Conreq, so it is the safer default.

bindery ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Conreq.

## Details

- [bindery](https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery.md)
- [Conreq](https://selfhost.directory/project/conreq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/conreq.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bindery-vs-conreq