# bindery vs Concat

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bindery | Concat |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #1 of 18 in Video Processing |
| GitHub stars | 540 | 12 409 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 410 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.46.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Concat scores 82/100 against 56/100 for bindery, so it is the safer default.

bindery ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.

If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; bindery needs more configuration.

Concat is growing faster right now (+2 410 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bindery](https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bindery.md)
- [Concat](https://selfhost.directory/project/concat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/concat.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bindery-vs-concat