BigTree CMSvsUmbraco CMS
Two self-hosted Content Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BigTree CMS | Umbraco CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #33 of 42 in Content Management | #7 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 223 | 5 278 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +23 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 27 |
| Latest release | — | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | C |
Which one should you pick?
Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 49/100 for BigTree CMS, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for BigTree CMS.
If you want the quickest setup, BigTree CMS is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.
Umbraco CMS is growing faster right now (+23 stars in 30 days).
BigTree CMS details →Umbraco CMS details →All Content Management projects →
Swap a project
Keep BigTree CMS, compare it with
Keep Umbraco CMS, compare it with