# BigBlueButton vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BigBlueButton | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 25 in Video Conferencing | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 9 259 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +31 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.0.40 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

BigBlueButton scores 73/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

BigBlueButton ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

BigBlueButton is growing faster right now (+31 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BigBlueButton](https://selfhost.directory/project/bigbluebutton) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bigbluebutton.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bigbluebutton-vs-windows-arm