# BigBlueButton vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BigBlueButton | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 25 in Video Conferencing | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 9 259 ✓ | 1 719 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +31 ✓ | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v3.0.40 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

BigBlueButton scores 73/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

BigBlueButton ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; BigBlueButton needs more configuration.

BigBlueButton is growing faster right now (+31 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BigBlueButton](https://selfhost.directory/project/bigbluebutton) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bigbluebutton.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bigbluebutton-vs-uusec-waf