BigBlueButtonvsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BigBlueButton | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 25 in Video Conferencing | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 9 259 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +31 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 9 |
| Latest release | v3.0.40 · 28 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
BigBlueButton scores 73/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
BigBlueButton ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; BigBlueButton needs more configuration.
BigBlueButton is growing faster right now (+31 stars in 30 days).
BigBlueButton details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep BigBlueButton, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with