# BigBlueButton vs mitmproxy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BigBlueButton | mitmproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 25 in Video Conferencing | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 9 258 | 46 459 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +31 | +1 324 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v3.0.40 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 73/100 for BigBlueButton, so it is the safer default.

BigBlueButton ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.

If you want the quickest setup, mitmproxy is easier to run; BigBlueButton needs more configuration.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 324 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BigBlueButton](https://selfhost.directory/project/bigbluebutton) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bigbluebutton.md)
- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bigbluebutton-vs-mitmproxy