bifrostvsvoidllm
Two self-hosted LiteLLM alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bifrost | voidllm | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 39 in API Gateway | #26 of 39 in API Gateway |
| GitHub stars | 9 181 | 145 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +890 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 50 | 18 |
| Latest release | transports/v2.3.2 · 20 Oct 2026 | v0.0.30 · 30 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
bifrost scores 74/100 against 43/100 for voidllm, so it is the safer default.
bifrost ships more often: 50 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for voidllm.
If you want the quickest setup, bifrost is easier to run; voidllm needs more configuration.
bifrost is growing faster right now (+890 stars in 30 days).
bifrost details →voidllm details → All LiteLLM alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep bifrost, compare it with
Keep voidllm, compare it with