# BiblioReads vs NeoDB

> Two self-hosted [Goodreads alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/goodreads), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BiblioReads | NeoDB |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 55/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #9 of 12 in Book Management | #35 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 357 | 902 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +10 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 55 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 0.19.10 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

NeoDB scores 55/100 against 48/100 for BiblioReads, so it is the safer default.

NeoDB ships more often: 55 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for BiblioReads.

If you want the quickest setup, BiblioReads is easier to run; NeoDB needs more configuration.

NeoDB is growing faster right now (+10 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BiblioReads](https://selfhost.directory/project/biblioreads) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/biblioreads.md)
- [NeoDB](https://selfhost.directory/project/neodb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/neodb.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/biblioreads-vs-neodb