BiblioReadsvsbookwyrm
Two self-hosted Goodreads alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BiblioReads | bookwyrm | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 12 in Book Management | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 357 | 2 806 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
bookwyrm scores 58/100 against 48/100 for BiblioReads, so it is the safer default.
bookwyrm ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for BiblioReads.
If you want the quickest setup, BiblioReads is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.
bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).
BiblioReads details →bookwyrm details → All Goodreads alternatives →