# bettercap vs MikroDash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bettercap | MikroDash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Network Security | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 20 214 ✓ | 632 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +193 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.41.7 · 11 May 2026 | v0.8.77 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

bettercap scores 75/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.

MikroDash ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for bettercap.

If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; bettercap needs more configuration.

bettercap is growing faster right now (+193 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bettercap](https://selfhost.directory/project/bettercap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bettercap.md)
- [MikroDash](https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bettercap-vs-mikrodash