# Beszel vs Pulse

> Two self-hosted [Infrastructure Monitoring projects](https://selfhost.directory/infrastructure-monitoring), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Beszel | Pulse |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 26 620 ✓ | 6 970 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +935 ✓ | +229 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 43 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.21.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Beszel scores 81/100 against 71/100 for Pulse, so it is the safer default.

Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for Beszel.

Beszel is growing faster right now (+935 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Beszel](https://selfhost.directory/project/beszel) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/beszel.md)
- [Pulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/beszel-vs-pulse