# BentoPDF vs Zigbee2MQTT

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BentoPDF | Zigbee2MQTT |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #5 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 16 188 ✓ | 15 762 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +477 ✓ | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 15 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.14.2 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 76/100 for Zigbee2MQTT, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; Zigbee2MQTT needs more configuration.

BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+477 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BentoPDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf.md)
- [Zigbee2MQTT](https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bentopdf-vs-zigbee2mqtt